Legal & Law Firms
Client privilege starts with knowing exactly where a file sits.
Privilege and confidentiality are the foundation of client trust, and both depend on knowing exactly where a file lives and who can reach it. Firms with any US nexus face an additional concern, the CLOUD Act can compel a US-based provider to hand over data regardless of where that data is physically stored. A cloud provider's terms of service is not the same as attorney-client privilege.
Case files, client communications, and privileged documents stay inside a jurisdiction you choose, outside the reach of foreign compelled-disclosure laws.
Document management, e-signatures, and secure file sharing, managed as one system instead of a patchwork of subscriptions with different vendors holding different pieces of a matter.
Contract review and legal research support that runs on your own infrastructure, so no client matter is ever processed by a third party's AI model.
Privilege & Cross-Border Disclosure Exposure
Firms using US-headquartered cloud providers may be subject to the CLOUD Act regardless of where their servers are physically located, a real and often overlooked exposure for privileged material. Naming the jurisdiction and the provider explicitly, rather than inheriting whatever a subscription defaults to, is the only way to actually answer a client's question about where their file sits.
0.5%
0.5%
SERVICE UPTIME SINCE 2024
150%
150%
Self-hosted & Private
100
100
Vendor lock-in
FAQ
We already use encrypted document management software. Isn't that enough?
Encryption protects data in transit and at rest, it doesn't answer which jurisdiction's laws apply to the underlying infrastructure, or who the provider is legally required to disclose to. Those are separate questions, and both matter for privilege.
How does this work with existing practice management software?
Depends on the tool, some integrate directly, others we replace with a self-hosted equivalent. We map your current stack during the scoping call before recommending which approach fits.
Can individual partners have separate access controls for their own matters?
Yes, access is configured per matter and per person, so confidentiality walls between partners or practice groups can be enforced structurally, not just by policy.